Glamor or potato?

Kinja'd!!! "Just Jeepin'" (macintux)
11/07/2019 at 20:47 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 8

Best 4wd system they offered on the Grand Cherokee but holy hell are the photos awful.

Kinja'd!!!

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!


DISCUSSION (8)


Kinja'd!!! ttyymmnn > Just Jeepin'
11/07/2019 at 21:09

Kinja'd!!!2

Always wipe off the lens on your phone before taking a picture


Kinja'd!!! Galileo Humpkins (aka MC Clap Yo Handz) > ttyymmnn
11/07/2019 at 21:23

Kinja'd!!!1

Yep, this is just like my MiL’s phone. Between her lotions and whatever else, her shit is so nasty and oily and she never cleans the phone. Then she asks me or my wife why her pics are so blurry.


Kinja'd!!! Brickman > Just Jeepin'
11/07/2019 at 21:27

Kinja'd!!!1

too much vaseline on your lens.


Kinja'd!!! subexpression > Just Jeepin'
11/07/2019 at 21:35

Kinja'd!!!0

Are you sure that soft blur isn’t artistic photography? The one photo looked pretty sharp.


Kinja'd!!! Just Jeepin' > subexpression
11/07/2019 at 21:41

Kinja'd!!!0

That’s why I included “glamor” as an option. I have no idea.


Kinja'd!!! WilliamsSW > Just Jeepin'
11/07/2019 at 21:55

Kinja'd!!!1

Blurred out the cigarette burns and bodily fluid stains


Kinja'd!!! Aremmes > Just Jeepin'
11/07/2019 at 22:10

Kinja'd!!!1

Like ttyymmnn pointed to , dirty lenses result in soft pictures like this. An old photography trick for producing soft-focus images was to s mudge a thin layer of vaseline around the edges of the front lens element. Some lenses even came in “soft” variants for this purpose.


Kinja'd!!! Just Jeepin' > Aremmes
11/07/2019 at 22:31

Kinja'd!!!1

I used to own  the Canon 135mm soft focus lens. I preferred the 85mm 1.8 but the 135mm came in handy once or twice.